
I for one am delighted that Jenson Button has won the Formula One World Drivers Championship. It’s taken him a decade to get there, but he finally did it.
Since the days of Mansell and Hill, Button has been the only British racing driver I’ve really been able to get behind, mainly because he’s the kind of racing driver I’d want to be.
He didn’t waste an opportunity to win plenty of races and titles in the best car on the grid, then whine about it, like David Coulthard in the McLaren did. And he’s not the corporate message-spouting, bland PR robot that Lewis Hamilton is.
I think it’s because Button was living the dream. At 19-years-old, I was playing Formula 1 computer games. At the same age, Button was driving an actual Formula 1 car and making a pretty good job of it. Yes, he came in for criticism for having a playboy lifestyle, with the fast cars, faster women and the luxury pad in Monte Carlo. But isn’t that the whole point of being a racing driver? That’s why Top Gear Magazine presented him with a CAMRRAD ‘Sex: Breakfast of Champions’ badge for his racing overalls. These drivers put their lives on the line every other weekend in far flung locations all over the world over the summer months. Why shouldn’t they let off some steam and enjoy themselves on their days off?
Flavio Briatore was the first to accuse Button of concentrating too much on pop singers and not enough on winning races. But I think that was mainly down to jealousy as, let’s be honest, Briatore is hardly an Adonis and is always sniffing around the latest leggy supermodel, not to mention the fact that the car he delivered for Button to race in was hardly the most competitive in the world.
The other criticism of Button’s career was that it took him too long to win a race. Yes, Jackie Stewart won three world titles within 100 races, but that was a different era. But look at Mika Hakkinen. He went 99 races before he finally won his first race. That’s only 13 fewer races than Button.
Then people point to the fact that Hamilton nearly won the title in his first season and eventually won it 12 months later, apparently proving he has unmatched raw talent. But he was in the best car and had been groomed to drive it since he was a child! And he never had to compete against Michael Schumacher.
The 2009 season was the first time Button had the best car on the grid (and let’s not forget the problems his Brawn GP had in getting the car on to the track in the first place). And what did he do with it? He won six of the first seven races. A poor driver can’t win races by just having a good car (as the two understudies for Filipe Massa have proved), in the same way a great driver can’t win in a dog of a car. Unless they’re Schumacher.
Now we’ve got people complaining that Button didn’t win another race this season after the Turkish Grand Prix in June, so therefore he isn’t a deserving champion. But the stats will show he has won six races this season (which is more than Hamilton won in 2008) and wrapped the title up with one race to spare (as opposed to Hamilton who won it on the last corner of the last lap of the last race).
F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone made no secret of the fact that he wanted the Championship to go down to the final race at the new UAE track. Yet if he’d succeeded in his original plans of having this year’s title decided on the number of race wins, the contest would have been over before the mid-way point of the season.
The rules are the same for everyone: amass more points than anyone else over the course of 18 races in a calendar year. The drivers won’t get more points for winning in Abu Dhabi than they do for winning in Melbourne, and the fact Button kept his points total ticking over when everybody else’s cars got quicker and he himself suffered a loss of form should be a testament to his ability, not a criticism.
